Comparing: Blockchain
How does Wikipedia describe Blockchain compared to Grokipedia, the AI-powered encyclopedia by xAI? Read both summaries below, then vote on which source you find more accurate and trustworthy.
Wikipedia
Blockchain
A blockchain is a distributed ledger with growing lists of records (blocks) that are securely linked together via cryptographic hashes. Each block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block, a timestamp, and transaction data. Since each block contains information about the previous block, they effectively form a chain, with each additional block linking to the ones before it. Consequently, blockchain transactions are resistant to alteration because, once recorded, the data in any given block cannot be changed retroactively without altering all subsequent blocks and obtaining network consensus to accept these changes.
Read more →
Grokipedia
Blockchain
technology that maintains a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked and secured using cryptography , enabling secure and verifiable transactions without reliance on a trusted third party . Each block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block, a timestamp, and transaction data, forming an immutable chain that resists tampering. Blockchain technology was invented by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin , and first described in the 2008 Bitcoin whitepaper as a chain of blocks secured by cryptographic hashes and proof-of-work to enable a decentralized digital ledger; originating from this whitepaper, blockchain addressed the double-spending problem in digital currencies through a consensus mechanism like proof-of-work, allowing decentralized validation of transactions across a peer-to-peer network. Beyond its foundational role in cryptocurrencies, which have achieved a global market capitalization exceeding trillions of dollars and facilitated borderless value transfer, blockchain has enabled applications in supply chain traceability , secure electronic health
Read more →Grok is doing the magic...
Reading both articles in full, analyzing biases, finding what Wikipedia won't tell you